Skip to content

announced a strategic investment and partnership with Arabic.ai.

Read the announcement
Talk to our team

Banking

Better prepared. Accountable at every step.

Arabic AI for research, document review, reporting and service preparation, with a clear path from source to reviewed output.

A trading office
A bank vault door

More information. A higher standard of preparation.

Research, reporting and service work draw on documents with different owners, dates and authority. A draft helps only when a professional can examine its basis.

  • Research scattered across documents
  • Reporting narratives that need checking
  • Service teams searching for current guidance

Support the work around financial decisions.

Choose a task to see what goes in, what is prepared, who reviews it and what comes out.

Research and strategy teams

Move from reading to a reviewable brief.

Frame a question against selected material, with source observations and interpretation kept apart.

Input
Approved research documents and a defined question.
Assistance
Organizes the relevant passages into a structured draft brief.
Review
An analyst verifies references, dates and interpretations.
Output
A research brief ready for professional discussion.

Operations and review teams

Make the differences easier to examine.

Compare supplied versions or requirements and prepare an exception list, with the originals at the center of the review.

Input
Selected document versions and a review checklist.
Assistance
Prepares a comparison and the questions for the reviewer.
Review
The document owner checks every material difference against the source.
Output
A review pack with the outstanding issues identified.

Reporting and business teams

Build the narrative around the supplied facts.

Turn approved reporting notes into a working narrative, with figures, periods and sources at hand.

Input
Approved reporting notes, source tables and writing instructions.
Assistance
Structures the narrative and flags gaps in the material.
Review
The reporting owner validates figures, interpretation and completeness.
Output
A draft narrative for the established review process.

Customer and internal service teams

Prepare the answer before the interaction.

Work from approved product and service guidance, with the questions that need escalation made visible.

Input
A service question and the permitted guidance.
Assistance
Drafts a response and lists unanswered or ambiguous points.
Review
The service colleague checks applicability and the escalation route.
Output
A reviewed response or a structured referral.

Trace a research brief back to its sources.

The brief is organized around source observations and review questions, so a colleague can examine the basis of each part.

  1. Research sourceSelected passage
  2. Reporting noteSupplied finding
  3. Internal guidanceApproved reference

Research brief

  1. Analyst observationResearch source: Selected passageResearch analyst
  2. Draft narrativeReporting note: Supplied findingReporting team
  3. Review questionInternal guidance: Approved referenceKnowledge owner

The accountable professional approves the work. Credit and investment decisions stay with authorized people.

Review the claim as well as the wording.

Define the permitted information and the named reviewer. Check references and send unsupported statements back for correction.

What reviewers check

  • Source support
  • Reviewer corrections
  • Unresolved questions
  1. Define the information boundary.

    Agree the permitted documents, purpose and review ownership with your security and architecture teams first.

  2. Test claims and exceptions.

    Review representative questions, ambiguous passages and missing information. Check that every statement is supported.

  3. Roll out with accountable owners.

    Start with a bounded team, track the corrections reviewers make and assess each new use separately.

Tested on financial reasoning.

Stanford CRFM's HELM Arabic Enterprise scores Arabic content generation, financial reasoning and UAE legal question answering.

See the benchmarks

Macro-averaged mean score, v1.1.0, 25 June 2026.

LLM-X0.825Reasoning and drafting
LLM-S0.724High-volume processing

Benchmark results only. They do not measure production reliability or autonomous decision-making.

What teams use.

LLM-X

Reasoning for research briefs.

Explore LLM Models

The AI workspace

Research and review in one workspace.

Explore Atelier

The agentic platform

Governed reporting workflows.

Explore Sadu

Make your next ambition operational.

Bring intelligence into your knowledge, people and operations. Talk to our team about the work you want to transform.

This page does not set marketing or analytics cookies, so there is nothing to change here.